[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 26, Issue 102 (5-2026) ::
audit knowledge 2026, 26(102): 86-119 Back to browse issues page
Audit Oversight Quality and Corporate Fraud Risk: The Moderating Role of Tax Avoidance Measures
Esmail Mazaheri * , Ali Kiani , Babak Abedi Sadaghiani
Assistant Professor of Accounting, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract:   (386 Views)
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of audit quality on the risk of fraud of companies by revealing the role of tax avoidance measures in companies listed in tehran stock exchange. The Company's fraud risk assessment by auditors with the audit process and this assessment is continually reviewed until the end of the audit operation, as auditors have a responsibility to the type, manner and amount of waste that is used in the audit process to counter the Company's fraud risk. therefore, the quality of their audit monitoring can affect the risk of fraud. the research time range includes eight consecutive years from persian to persian. statistical sample includes 125 companies operating in tehran stock exchange. the final analysis of the data has been done with the help of vari ational statistical software. The results of the research hypotheses showed that the quality of internal audit oversight has a negative and significant effect on the company's fraud risk, and the tax avoidance criteria (CFO ETRs - CFO ETRs) have a positive and significant effect on the relationship between the quality of internal audit oversight and the company's fraud risk, and the criterion (Total BTDs) has a negative and insignificant effect. Also, the quality of external audit oversight has a negative and significant effect on the company's fraud risk, and the tax avoidance criteria(Cash ETRs - Total BTDs) have a negative and significant effect on the relationship between the quality of internal audit oversight and the company's fraud risk, and the criterion (CFO ETRs) has a negative and insignificant effect. Also, these results emphasize that fraud monitoring is a dynamic process that is influenced by managerial decisions such as tax avoidance. Therefore, increasing transparency in tax reporting and improving disclosure requirements can help strengthen the effectiveness of audit monitoring and reduce fraud risk in listed companies.
Keywords: external audit monitoring, internal audit monitoring, fraud risk, tax avoidance
Full-Text [PDF 1150 kb]   (164 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Auditing
Received: 2025/10/18 | Accepted: 2026/02/2 | Published: 2026/05/31
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mazaheri E, kiani A, Abedi Sadaghiani B. Audit Oversight Quality and Corporate Fraud Risk: The Moderating Role of Tax Avoidance Measures. audit knowledge 2026; 26 (102) :86-119
URL: http://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-3417-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 26, Issue 102 (5-2026) Back to browse issues page
دانش حسابرسی Audit  Science
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.14 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4766