[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 26, Issue 103 (9-2026) ::
audit knowledge 2026, 26(103): 57-82 Back to browse issues page
Investigating the Impact of Disclosing Key Audit Matters on Users' Confidence and the Responsibility Attributed to Auditors
Melika Baraz , Mohammadhossein Ghaemi * , Abasali Daryaee , Seyedmostafa Alavi
Abstract:   (29 Views)
In recent years, audit reports, whose primary objective is to provide assurance regarding the accuracy of financial statements prepared by company management, have faced criticism concerning their format, content, and informational value. In response to these criticisms, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) introduced International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 701. This standard requires auditors to disclose "Key Audit Matters" (KAMs) in their reports. Following the mandatory implementation of this disclosure requirement in audit reports of Iranian companies, the aim of this study is to examine the impact of this requirement on the confidence level of users in financial statements and the degree of responsibility attributed to auditors by users. To achieve this, an experimental study was conducted, collecting data from 45 financial analysts through a questionnaire. The data were analyzed using covariance, variance, and paired t-tests. The results revealed that the disclosure or non-disclosure of Key Audit Matters in the independent auditor's report does not lead to a significant change in the confidence level of users. Furthermore, if users become aware of a material misstatement in the financial statements after the issuance of the audit report, whether the auditor disclosed the misstatement in the KAM section of the audit report or not does not affect the level of responsibility users attribute to the auditor for the misstatement.
 
Keywords: Key Audit Matters (KAMs), Experimental Method, User Assurance Level, Auditor's Responsibility
Full-Text [PDF 929 kb]   (18 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Auditing
Received: 2024/06/30 | Accepted: 2025/03/2 | Published: 2026/09/1
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Baraz M, Ghaemi M, Daryaee A, Alavi S. Investigating the Impact of Disclosing Key Audit Matters on Users' Confidence and the Responsibility Attributed to Auditors. audit knowledge 2026; 26 (103) :57-82
URL: http://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-3270-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 26, Issue 103 (9-2026) Back to browse issues page
دانش حسابرسی Audit  Science
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4766