[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 24, Issue 97 (2-2025) ::
audit knowledge 2025, 24(97): 233-267 Back to browse issues page
Identifying budget violations and deviations with key indicators and mathematical model in the Settlement Reports
Javad Abdali , Syed farzad Hashemi * , Mohsen Hashemigohar , Mohsen Shohhoseini
quods university
Abstract:   (260 Views)
Abstract
The most important goals of the budget laws, five-year plans, are not realized in the implementation of annual budget laws. The purpose of this research is to present key indicators of budget performance and a mathematical model to identify corruption, violations, and budget deviations in monitoring, auditing, and budget disbursement reports, so that individual preferences in the process of preparing the aforementioned reports are reduced and the extent of responsibilities and the reasons for failure to achieve goals and omissions in the implementation of budget laws are presented in a transparent, quantitative, and verifiable manner. The statistical population is financial and budget experts and specialists who were selected based on the Cochran formula in a number of 384 people, and the research method is library and field, and the tool for collecting experts' opinions is a questionnaire. The data were prioritized using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Expert Choice (EC) software, and their importance, validity, and reliability coefficients were determined using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) method, and the results were sufficiently reliable. According to the AHP method, the priority of key indicators of budget performance in identifying budget violations and deviations includes the following indicators: budget mandates, budget macroeconomic variables, budget expenditures, and budget resources. According to the PLS method, the importance coefficients of independent variables on the dependent variable are, respectively, evaluation of effective management of financial resources and prevention of violations, the extent to which executive agencies fulfill their duties, determining legal requirements and accountability, and ranking financial and budget performance of managers.
Keywords: Inbudge mathematical model, budget law settlement report, corruption and violations, key indicators, Supreme Audit Court.
Full-Text [PDF 1844 kb]   (130 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Auditing
Received: 2024/04/13 | Accepted: 2024/07/20 | Published: 2025/02/28
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abdali J, hashemi S F, hashemigohar M, shohhoseini M. Identifying budget violations and deviations with key indicators and mathematical model in the Settlement Reports. audit knowledge 2025; 24 (97) :233-267
URL: http://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-3342-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 24, Issue 97 (2-2025) Back to browse issues page
دانش حسابرسی Audit  Science
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657