[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 26, Issue 103 (9-2026) ::
audit knowledge 2026, 26(103): 188-230 Back to browse issues page
The Transaction Norm Drift Model in Algorithmic Bank Transaction Monitoring and Its Implications for Auditing in Iran
Mohammad Habibpour fatideh *
Abstract:   (18 Views)
The use of machine-learning algorithms to monitor bank transactions rests on the assumption that a relatively stable distinction can be drawn between normal and suspicious transaction behavior. This assumption is difficult to sustain in an economy where price levels, nominal transaction values, transaction rules, payment channels, and customer behavior continually change. This article examines how changes in transaction norms affect the reliability and auditability of bank monitoring models. Drawing on an integrative and critical review of the literature, documentary analysis of reports issued by central banks and regulatory authorities, and secondary analysis of data from Iran’s payment system, the article formulates the concept of transaction norm drift. The proposed model distinguishes among three forms of change: behavioral-distributional drift in transaction characteristics, relational-semantic drift in the association between transaction patterns and risk, and institutional-normative drift in the formal and operational definition of suspicious behavior. The model also incorporates the feedback loop among algorithmic decisions, bank interventions, and adaptation by customers and offenders. Within this framework, the reliability of algorithmic monitoring depends on both the model’s technical structure and the distance between the norm learned during the training period and the prevailing transaction norm. In Iran, inflation, rapid changes in the nominal value of transactions, regulatory changes, and shifts among payment channels may cause fixed thresholds and outdated models to produce alert inflation or fail to detect emerging patterns. The scope of auditing should therefore encompass the reference period of the data, peer-group formation, adjustment of nominal variables, threshold setting, drift monitoring, model versioning, and human intervention. The transaction norm drift model provides a framework for evaluating banks’ algorithmic monitoring systems and designing auditing arrangements suited to Iran’s economic and institutional conditions.
 
Keywords: Algorithmic monitoring, artificial intelligence, concept drift, Iranian banking system, model auditing, transaction norm drift
Full-Text [PDF 1033 kb]   (7 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Auditing
Received: 2026/09/1 | Accepted: 2026/10/12 | Published: 2026/09/1
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Habibpour fatideh M. The Transaction Norm Drift Model in Algorithmic Bank Transaction Monitoring and Its Implications for Auditing in Iran. audit knowledge 2026; 26 (103) :188-230
URL: http://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-3499-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 26, Issue 103 (9-2026) Back to browse issues page
دانش حسابرسی Audit  Science
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.14 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4766